Refining My Wine Tasting
- Teams Fatloong + Quatjin K

- 14 hours ago
- 5 min read
Although wine tasting may initially seem complex or exclusive, this essay argues that traditional wine-tasting techniques are accessible and grounded in common sense, making them accessible to everyone. To support this claim, the essay is organised into several sections. First, it outlines the fundamentals of the traditional tasting method and demonstrates how its step-by-step process engages all the senses. Next, the essay discusses strategies for building tasting skills, recommends practical approaches for learning, and considers the importance of structured education. Finally, it explores how developing wine knowledge can enrich everyday experiences. The traditional method encourages participants to pause, reflect, and engage all their senses: sight, scent, taste, aftertaste, and the lasting impression that the wine imparts. Imagine the gleam of lush berries, the whiff of fresh-cut herbs, the smooth texture of silk on your palate, and the warm impression of a sun-drenched afternoon. These vibrant sensations invite novices more fully into the ritual of wine tasting.
Traditional wine textbooks and structured tasting exercises remain useful. To help internalise the discipline of wine tasting more naturally, follow the sequence of experiencing a wine in the glass. Begin with appearance, noting colour and clarity—such as the deep ruby glow of a Cabernet Sauvignon or the pale straw hue of a young Riesling. Proceed to the nose, identifying aromas and early impressions; for example, one might detect a hint of fresh green apple or subtle notes of vanilla. Then, focus on the palate to discern the wine's flavours, texture, and body. For instance, the wine may exhibit a creamy mouthfeel and flavours reminiscent of ripe cherries or toasted almonds. Finish by considering the aftertaste and the wine's lasting impression, and using this clear-tasting format and memorising to build a foundation in wine tasting. While tasting is inherently subjective, a disciplined method, when paired with openness, can enhance objectivity.
At the start, focus on one well-chosen, quality book as your foundation. Ask yourself a question that sparks your curiosity, such as "What does acid ty feel like?" For example, you could design a problem-based learning activity in which you compare several wines known for varying acidity levels, taste them side by side, and record your reactions to each. By noting the physical sensations, flavour impact, and overall balance that acidity imparts in each wine, you actively investigate your initial question. This inquiry will guide your study and deepen your understanding of the subject. Actual wine knowledge develops when you consistently apply and question both procedural and substantive concepts.
Taste with like-minded friends and take snapshots of your tasting to capture the moment. As you write and compare your notes, correlate the quality profiles and length, and examine the wine structures of various wines of the same genre. Plot these observations on an X-Y coordinate system to bring your tasting experiences to life. For example, you might plot aroma intensity on the X-axis and acidity level on the Y-axis. The purpose of this X-Y plotting is to provide a visual representation of how different wines compare based on specific qualities, making it easier to identify relationships, trends, or anomalies among samples. This kind of plotting can help visualise endpoints in your flavour and the characteristics of the wines. Understand these patterns and enhance them, accompanied by insights from knowledgeable peers. Use your tasting framework regularly, and once you are comfortable with it, let your intuition and senses guide you beyond the established structure.
Be honest in your assessments. Descriptors alone are not enough; form well-reasoned opinions about quality. Assigning scores can also help with benchmarking. When conducting Bordeaux match-ups, move beyond merely observing differences and engage in detailed analysis: for example, examine how acidity in a classic red Bordeaux tends to provide freshness and longevity, while a New World blend might offer softer acidity but riper fruit character. Assess tannin structure by comparing the firm, structured tannins typical of Bordeaux with the often plusher, smoother tannins of New World wines. Aroma complexity can be contrasted by noting the earthy, cedar, and graphite notes of a Bordeaux against the expressive fruit-forward aromas in a New World blend. At the same time, the finish may be longer and more layered in Bordeaux due to its ageing potential. Similarly, a comparison between Pauillac and Pomerol can highlight Pauillac's robuPauillac's structure and pronounced blackcurrant notes, versus Pomerol's softePomerol's and dominant plum and truffle aromatics; or, when assessing an inexpensive white Bordeaux alongside a Sauvignon de Touraine, critically evaluate how the Bordeaux's blenBordeaux'sgnon Blanc and Sémillon imparts roundness and subtlety as compared to the zesty, high-acid profile and pronounced citrus of a varietal Touraine Sauvignon. For dessert wines, emphasis levels, balance, and texture; for instance, compare the lush richness and honeyed botrytis character of Sauternes with the brighter acidity and lighter mouthfeel of a Jurançon, noting how these factors influence both overall impression and drinkability. Through systematically comparing these specific factors, you can better interpret what defines each wine and deepen your understanding of its unique characteristics. Read your books and find the meaning. Retaste if you still have time; clear any post-learning doubts.
Consider enrolling in a structured program, such as Wine Studies Levels 1, 2, or 3. Level 1 equips you to decode restaurant wine lists, granting quick value for dining experiences. Level 2 improves your ability to make knowledgeable wine purchases, while Level 3 prepares you for professional tasting and critique. Seek out engaging courses with comprehensive and reliable content.
Most wine educators agree that official education is valuable. However, the primary objective extends beyond imparting technical details; it should be to integrate wine more meaningfully into individual lives, as a modest Chianti enjoyed during a simple weekday supper: here, technical knowledge enhances both conversation and enjoyment. These everyday moments demonstrate how a deeper understanding of wine can transform routine occasions into memorable and valued experiences, thereby underscoring the broader significance of wine education. More broadly, wine education can foster cultural appreciation, deepen social bonds, and encourage mindfulness in daily life. By prompting individuals to engage thoughtfully with what they consume, wine education fosters critical reflection on tradition, regional identity, and historical context, enriching both individual and collective experiences. In this way, the impact of wine education reaches beyond the technical or sensory, contributing meaningfully to personal growth and cultural literacy.
In summary, adopting the traditional wine tasting method alongside self-directed, problem-based learning creates a holistic and inclusive approach to wine education. By integrating practical experience, structured techniques, and analytical challenges, individuals are empowered to both appreciate and critically assess wine in a manner that is both accessible and deeply meaningful. This comprehensive approach not only enhances sensory awareness and technical proficiency but also fosters lifelong learning and personal enrichment, ultimately ensuring that wine appreciation becomes an engaging and transformative pursuit for a diverse range of learners.
Rewritten 15 January 2026; Kevin Tang.





















Comments